[U-Boot] [PATCH 09/11] IMX: add additional function for pinmux using an array

[Nikita Kiryanov <nikita@compulab.co.il>]

On 04/09/2014 06:40 PM, Tim Harvey wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Nikita Kiryanov <nikita@compulab.co.il> wrote:
>> Hi Tim,
>>
>>
>> On 04/03/2014 09:01 AM, Tim Harvey wrote:
>>>
>>> Add new function that can take an array of iomux configs, an index, and
>>> a stride to allow a multi-dimentional array of pinmux values to be used
>>> to define pinmux values per cpu-type.
>>>
>>> This takes a different approach to previously proposed solutions which
>>> used
>>> multiple arrays of pad lists. The goal is to eliminate having these
>>> multiple
>>> arrays such as 'mx6q_uart1_pads' and 'mx6dl_uart1_pads' which are almost
>>> identical copies of each other except for the MX6Q/MX6DL prefix on the
>>> PAD.
>>
>>
>> I like this approach, but I think you should also define the IOMUX,
>> SETUP_PAD, and SETUP_PADS macros from patch 10 in this file, as they
>> (macros and function) are clearly meant to be used together.
>>
>
> I agree with this. Do the macro names IOMUX, SETUP_PAD, SETUP_PADS make sense?
>

My suggestion would be MX6QDL_DDR_IOMUX, MX6QDL_DDR_SETUP_PADS, and
MX6QDL_SETUP_PAD (this last one is not DDR specific).


-- 
Regards,
Nikita.