From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: [PATCH] evtchn: eliminate 64k ports limitation Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:54:42 +0100 Message-ID: <5346BEC2.6040009@gmail.com> References: <533BE06802000078000048B7@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WYHJP-0005iO-4d for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:54:47 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id cc10so5246901wib.10 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 08:54:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <533BE06802000078000048B7@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: xen-devel , David Vrabel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Jan Beulich wrote: > The introduction of FIFO event channels claimed to support over 100k > ports, but failed to widen a number of 16-bit variables/operations. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Acked-by: Keir Fraser