Re: CGL compliance layer initiative

["João Henrique Ferreira de Freitas" <joaohf@gmail.com>]

Hi Vali,

I took a look into meta-cgl and I've builded with all master (lots of 
warning) layers described in README file. Good initiative.

I noted that in README file you mention about 'meta-openclovis'. I 
believed that you got openipmi recipe from meta-openclovis, because
meta-cgl has a .bbappend to it. Am I right?

Indeed meta-openclovis has three recipes that could stay in meta-cgl: 
openhpi, openhpi-subagent and openipmi.

What about the quality of recipes that meta-cgl will use from others 
layers? For instance the patchs/stable code release/features in net-snmp 
recipe
is aligned with CGL requirements? My concern is about the scope and 
stability of meta-cgl.

Thanks.

PS:

Build Configuration:
BB_VERSION        = "1.23.0"
BUILD_SYS         = "x86_64-linux"
NATIVELSBSTRING   = "Ubuntu-13.10"
TARGET_SYS        = "i586-poky-linux"
MACHINE           = "qemux86"
DISTRO            = "poky"
DISTRO_VERSION    = "1.6+snapshot-20140411"
TUNE_FEATURES     = "m32 i586"
TARGET_FPU        = ""
meta              = "master:863cc7483f5ee43189537940de8ee5c0964d24cc"
meta-cgl          = "master:63a890e8513ff50279a1ce53e45a0394fd05b2b6"
meta-qt3          = "master:3016129d90b7ac8517a5227d819f10ad417b5b45"
meta-networking
meta-filesystems
meta-oe
meta-perl         = "master:477ccd867cc71f8277f2670b7be34b3b15300052"
meta-yocto
meta-yocto-bsp    = "master:863cc7483f5ee43189537940de8ee5c0964d24cc"
meta-virtualization = "master:7544bfb6ec7efd283e7e7ff712e91452fdffb534"
meta-openclovis   = "master:68f9a9c4ab01590d63506126660e3316ba668f99"
meta-selinux      = "master:0362287928bc0a58b755488ebd74441c28eeeee2"
meta-security     = "master:7e8c7918d9ff8fc89579502cc136e37deecdfd96"
meta-openstack    = "master:940e7d24c418a9cbb93850c31d00e4f1edeaf764"

-- 
João Henrique Ferreira de Freitas - joaohf_at_gmail.com
Campinas-SP-Brasil