From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C07E00CE9 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 05:46:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s3BCk0TX021237 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 11 Apr 2014 05:46:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.56.48] (128.224.56.48) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.169.1; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 05:45:59 -0700 Message-ID: <5347E401.2050804@windriver.com> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 08:45:53 -0400 From: Bruce Ashfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vali Cobelea , Diego Sueiro References: <534416F0.10109@enea.com> <9507315.eLP4En45Q5@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> <53452733.2070806@enea.com> <33266524.grSQoK8z6t@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> <53452985.7020202@enea.com> <534793A2.2000603@enea.com> In-Reply-To: <534793A2.2000603@enea.com> Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, Alexandru Vaduva , Paul Eggleton Subject: Re: CGL compliance layer initiative X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 12:46:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 14-04-11 03:02 AM, Vali Cobelea wrote: > Hi Diego, > > Thank you for your interest in the meta-cgl layer. > Please be aware that the layer is in its alpha state, as I said an > initiative that started with a layer. > > The branch is 'master', no custom things yet. > Below you can find the instructions to clone all of the "dependency layers": > > git clonegit://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-qt3 > > git clonegit://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-virtualization > > git clonegit://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-selinux > > git clonegit://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-cloud-services > > git clonegit://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-security > > git clonehttps://github.com/joaohf/meta-openclovis.git > > Also, since there are duplicated recipes in these layers, please add the > following BBMASK in cong/local.conf (big thank you to Alex Vaduva for > this): > > BBMASK = > "meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack/recipes-support/lvm2|meta-security/recipes-security/libcap-ng" > What exactly are you finding with lvm2 in meta-cloud-services ? Bruce > > Let me know how the test goes Deigo. > > > Best regards, > Vali > > On 04/11/2014 12:35 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote: >> >> Vali, >> >> I'm excited to see CGL support for Yocto. >> I'm going to test this layer as soon as possible. >> >> One question, which branch of Yocto is it based on? >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> *dS >> Diego Sueiro >> sent from mobile. >> >> On Apr 9, 2014 11:05 AM, "Vali Cobelea" > > wrote: >> >> OK Paul, that indeed makes sense, I really did not knew that >> preliminary versions of layers are accepted. >> I will discuss around here and if everything goes OK we will start >> the move in the "public" layer index. >> I also do agree with an all-together strategy, no matter for the >> layer state. >> >> >> Much appreciated, >> Vali >> >> >> On 04/09/2014 02:01 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: >> >> On Wednesday 09 April 2014 13:55:47 Vali Cobelea wrote: >> >> On 04/09/2014 01:51 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: >> >> On Tuesday 08 April 2014 18:34:08 Vali Cobelea wrote: >> >> Here at ENEA we decided to take the initiative >> regarding the CGL >> compliance when it comes to the Yocto Project. >> For this we started the work on a dedicated layer >> called 'meta-cgl' >> >> which can be accessed / cloned from here: >> http://git.enea.com/git/?p=linux/meta-cgl.git >> git clone git@git.enea.com:linux/meta-cgl >> >> Have a look of the things we got there so far, >> please remember that >> there is still plenty of work to be done (layer >> architecture, CGL >> requirements coverage mode and so on). >> It is a little bit more than a stub layer, >> consider it a starting point >> for the direction we would like to have with this >> layer. >> >> Any input is much appreciated, lets keep the >> discussion by this email >> thread and see where it goes. >> >> I don't have anything to offer on the layer contents, >> but I would say in >> order to make it easy for people to find this layer I >> would strongly >> encourage you to> >> submit it to the OpenEmbedded layer index: >> http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/submit/ >> >> Thank you for the input. >> We will keep the layer for a short period of time at the >> current >> location while getting other ideas regarding the content / >> architecture. >> The layer initiative will also be raised up in the board >> advisory >> meeting, in order to get even more input. >> After which we will make it easier to find, access and use >> for anyone, >> exactly as you suggested. >> >> OK, as the maintainer it's totally up to you. >> >> I would say though generally that I'd like to see more people >> adding their >> work-in-progress layers to the layer index, even if at some >> time later they >> will be moved elsewhere or absorbed into another layer - it >> just makes it >> easier to point people to the layer index so they can find >> recipes that have >> already been written, rather than having to re-write them from >> scratch. >> >> Cheers, >> Paul >> >> >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> yocto mailing list >> yocto@yoctoproject.org >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >> > > >