From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] xen/arm: implement get_maximum_gpfn hypercall Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 14:17:17 +0100 Message-ID: <5347EB5D.8080309@linaro.org> References: <1397148539-19084-1-git-send-email-w1.huang@samsung.com> <1397148539-19084-3-git-send-email-w1.huang@samsung.com> <5346D4A1.5030909@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5346D4A1.5030909@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Andrew Cooper Cc: Wei Huang , ian.campbell@citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, jaeyong.yoo@samsung.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, yjhyun.yoo@samsung.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hi Andrew, On 04/10/2014 06:28 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 10/04/14 17:48, Wei Huang wrote: >> From: Jaeyong Yoo >> >> This patchi implements get_maximum_gpfn by using the memory map >> info in arch_domain (from set_memory_map hypercall). >> >> Signed-off-by: Evgeny Fedotov > > Common implementation and a specific arch_get_maximum_gpfn() ? domain_get_maximum_gfn is already a common implementation. Except prefixing this function by arch_. I don't think it's possible to be more common... Regards, -- Julien Grall