From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleksij Rempel Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 15:58:05 +0200 Subject: [ath9k-devel] support for 80211k (Kathiravan) In-Reply-To: References: <53479ABC.7050700@gmail.com> Message-ID: <5347F4ED.7060308@rempel-privat.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org Am 11.04.2014 12:19, schrieb Kathiravan: > Pradeep Reddy gmail.com> writes: > >> >> >> Kathiravan, >> There is no support for 802.11k in ath9k. >> -- >> Pradeep >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ath9k-devel mailing list >> ath9k-devel lists.ath9k.org >> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel >> > > > Hi Pradeep, > > Thanks much for your prompt reply. > I just want to understand if there is any dependency on firmware for > implementation of 802.11k. there is no firmware in ath9k. Only ath9k-htc need firmware. So, which driver do you mean? > What i understand is that we need to send the action frame command to the > firmware and the firmware takes the initiative to send the packet OTA. > Is my understanding correct? > > For example to send the ADDBA request the below is the command which we send > to the firmware. > > #define HostCmd_CMD_11N_ADDBA_REQ 0x00ce > > For 802.11k implementation i reckon the corresponding Action command to be > present in the firmware to support this feature.Am i right? > > Looking forward for your valuable comments. > > Regards, > Kathiravan T. -- Regards, Oleksij -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 278 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.ath9k.org/pipermail/ath9k-devel/attachments/20140411/c4f9ceb6/attachment.pgp