From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] spapr: add ibm, chip-id property in device tree
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 02:41:47 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53481B4B.6010805@ozlabs.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53481879.5090007@suse.de>
On 04/12/2014 02:29 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 13.03.14 07:29, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> This adds a "ibm,chip-id" property for CPU nodes which should be the same
>> for all cores in the same CPU socket. The recent guest kernels use this
>> information to associate threads with sockets.
>>
>> Refer to the kernel commit 256f2d4b463d3030ebc8d2b54f427543814a2bdc
>> for more details.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
>> ---
>> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 9 +++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>> index bf46c38..6366230 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>> @@ -308,6 +308,8 @@ static void *spapr_create_fdt_skel(hwaddr initrd_base,
>> uint32_t interrupt_server_ranges_prop[] = {0, cpu_to_be32(smp_cpus)};
>> int i, smt = kvmppc_smt_threads();
>> unsigned char vec5[] = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x80};
>> + QemuOpts *opts = qemu_opts_find(qemu_find_opts("smp-opts"), NULL);
>> + unsigned sockets = opts ? qemu_opt_get_number(opts, "sockets", 0) : 0;
>> fdt = g_malloc0(FDT_MAX_SIZE);
>> _FDT((fdt_create(fdt, FDT_MAX_SIZE)));
>> @@ -465,6 +467,13 @@ static void *spapr_create_fdt_skel(hwaddr initrd_base,
>> page_sizes_prop, page_sizes_prop_size)));
>> }
>> + if (sockets) {
>> + int cpus_per_socket = smp_cpus / sockets;
>> + uint32_t chip_id = cs->cpu_index / cpus_per_socket;
>> +
>> + _FDT((fdt_property_cell(fdt, "ibm,chip-id", chip_id)));
>> + }
>
> Have you verified this works correctly with threads?
Sorry, do not follow you.
-smp X,sockets=Y,threads=Z - what combination of XYZ is suspicious?
> Also, I don't see why
> we should omit the chip-id when we don't define sockets.
Why should we pollute device tree...
--
Alexey
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-11 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-13 6:29 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] spapr: add ibm, chip-id property in device tree Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-04-11 16:29 ` Alexander Graf
2014-04-11 16:41 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53481B4B.6010805@ozlabs.ru \
--to=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.