From: Li Zefan <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET cgroup/for-3.15] cgroup: implement unified hierarchy
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 10:58:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <534CA050.8060709@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140414192139.GB16835-Gd/HAXX7CRxy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
on 2014/4/15 3:21, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:14:21PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> So is this an intermediate mode before we move to single hiearchy *only*
>> mode. AFAIK, you had mentioned that we will support legacy multiple
>> hiearchy mode but single hiearchy is the new default mode.
>
> Hmmm? It's a separate special hierarchy which can co-exist with other
> hierarchies. There's no inherent intermediacy to it. As long as
> traditional hierarchies exist, it's gonna be like this.
>
I know we should allow multiple hierarchies, but why we allow this even
if sane_behavior is specified?
Like this:
# mount -t cgroup -o cpuset,__DEVEL__sane_behavior xxx /cgroup
# mount -t cgroup -o __DEVEL__sane_behavior xxx /cgroup2/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
<containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
<cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET cgroup/for-3.15] cgroup: implement unified hierarchy
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 10:58:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <534CA050.8060709@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140414192139.GB16835@htj.dyndns.org>
on 2014/4/15 3:21, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:14:21PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> So is this an intermediate mode before we move to single hiearchy *only*
>> mode. AFAIK, you had mentioned that we will support legacy multiple
>> hiearchy mode but single hiearchy is the new default mode.
>
> Hmmm? It's a separate special hierarchy which can co-exist with other
> hierarchies. There's no inherent intermediacy to it. As long as
> traditional hierarchies exist, it's gonna be like this.
>
I know we should allow multiple hierarchies, but why we allow this even
if sane_behavior is specified?
Like this:
# mount -t cgroup -o cpuset,__DEVEL__sane_behavior xxx /cgroup
# mount -t cgroup -o __DEVEL__sane_behavior xxx /cgroup2/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-15 2:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-28 2:40 [PATCHSET cgroup/for-3.15] cgroup: implement unified hierarchy Tejun Heo
2014-03-28 2:40 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-28 2:40 ` [PATCH 04/12] cgroup: make css_next_child() skip missing csses Tejun Heo
2014-03-28 2:40 ` [PATCH 06/12] cgroup: teach css_task_iter about effective csses Tejun Heo
2014-03-28 2:40 ` [PATCH 10/12] cgroup: update subsystem rebind restrictions Tejun Heo
2014-03-28 2:41 ` [PATCH 11/12] cgroup: prepare migration path for unified hierarchy Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <1395974461-12735-1-git-send-email-tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-28 2:40 ` [PATCH 01/12] cgroup: update cgroup->subsys_mask to ->child_subsys_mask and restore cgroup_root->subsys_mask Tejun Heo
2014-03-28 2:40 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-28 2:40 ` [PATCH 02/12] cgroup: introduce effective cgroup_subsys_state Tejun Heo
2014-03-28 2:40 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-28 2:40 ` [PATCH 03/12] cgroup: implement cgroup->e_csets[] Tejun Heo
2014-03-28 2:40 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-28 2:40 ` [PATCH 04/12] cgroup: make css_next_child() skip missing csses Tejun Heo
2014-03-28 2:40 ` [PATCH 05/12] cgroup: reorganize css_task_iter Tejun Heo
2014-03-28 2:40 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-28 2:40 ` [PATCH 06/12] cgroup: teach css_task_iter about effective csses Tejun Heo
2014-03-28 2:40 ` [PATCH 07/12] cgroup: cgroup->subsys[] should be cleared after the css is offlined Tejun Heo
2014-03-28 2:40 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-28 2:40 ` [PATCH 08/12] cgroup: allow cgroup creation and suppress automatic css creation in the unified hierarchy Tejun Heo
2014-03-28 2:40 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-28 2:40 ` [PATCH 09/12] cgroup: add css_set->dfl_cgrp Tejun Heo
2014-03-28 2:40 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-28 2:40 ` [PATCH 10/12] cgroup: update subsystem rebind restrictions Tejun Heo
2014-03-28 2:41 ` [PATCH 11/12] cgroup: prepare migration path for unified hierarchy Tejun Heo
2014-03-28 2:41 ` [PATCH 12/12] cgroup: implement dynamic subtree controller enable/disable on the default hierarchy Tejun Heo
2014-03-28 2:41 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-28 2:41 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-14 15:45 ` [PATCHSET cgroup/for-3.15] cgroup: implement unified hierarchy Vivek Goyal
2014-04-14 15:45 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <20140414154556.GA9552-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-14 17:52 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-14 17:52 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20140414175236.GB15249-Gd/HAXX7CRxy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-14 18:14 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-04-14 18:14 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <20140414181421.GC9552-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-14 19:21 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-14 19:21 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20140414192139.GB16835-Gd/HAXX7CRxy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-15 2:58 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2014-04-15 2:58 ` Li Zefan
[not found] ` <534CA050.8060709-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-15 4:57 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-15 4:57 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-30 10:57 ` Raghavendra KT
2014-04-30 10:57 ` Raghavendra KT
[not found] ` <CAC4Lta0qd2vW4ENSOpzK+0i06MorzfmsZZZuW9xUtpZ_gWA9gA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-02 15:12 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-02 15:12 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20140502151250.GB10204-Gd/HAXX7CRxy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-05 16:37 ` Raghavendra KT
2014-05-05 16:37 ` Raghavendra KT
2014-04-14 21:31 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-14 21:31 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-15 22:05 ` [PATCH 0.5/12] cgroup: cgroup_apply_cftypes() shouldn't skip the default hierarhcy Tejun Heo
2014-04-15 22:05 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-15 22:05 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20140415220504.GA13099-9pTldWuhBndy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-15 22:05 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-15 22:05 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=534CA050.8060709@huawei.com \
--to=lizefan-hv44wf8li93qt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.