From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: vegard.nossum@oracle.com, penberg@kernel.org,
jamie.iles@oracle.com, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86/insn: Extract more information about instructions
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:36:20 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <534CB744.8090208@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <534CA38C.80501@hitachi.com>
(2014/04/15 12:12), Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2014/04/15 2:44), Sasha Levin wrote:
>> arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt provides us quite a lot of information about
>> instructions. So far we've discarded information we didn't need to use
>> elsewhere.
>>
>> This patch extracts two more bits of information about instructions:
>
> These information looks obscure to me. What information (documents)
> does it based on? Could you give me how would you get it?
>
>> - Mnemonic. We'd like to refer to instructions by their mnemonic, and not
>> by their opcode. This both makes code readable, and less confusing and
>> prone to typos since a single mnemonic may have quite a few different
>> opcodes representing it.
>
> I don't like to call it as "mnemonic", it is just "operation".
Ah, I see what you are doing now. Hmm, you'd like to generate a mnemonic-ID
and its macros for each opcode, wouldn't you?
Even though, it seems waste of memory that we have both opcode and mnemonic-ID,
can you integrate that? for example, you can use insn->opcode.value instead of
checking each opcode bytes.
Thank you,
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-15 4:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-14 17:44 [PATCH 1/4] kmemcheck: add additional selfchecks Sasha Levin
2014-04-14 17:44 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86: Move instruction decoder data into header Sasha Levin
2014-04-15 1:41 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-15 2:28 ` Sasha Levin
2014-04-15 3:10 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-15 14:24 ` Sasha Levin
2014-04-16 3:06 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-14 17:44 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86/insn: Extract more information about instructions Sasha Levin
2014-04-15 3:12 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-15 4:36 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2014-04-15 15:10 ` Sasha Levin
2014-04-16 3:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-16 3:47 ` Sasha Levin
2014-04-16 3:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-16 4:03 ` Sasha Levin
2014-04-16 4:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-16 5:30 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-17 15:20 ` Sasha Levin
2014-04-17 15:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-17 17:31 ` Sasha Levin
2014-04-18 3:40 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-18 3:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-18 15:47 ` Sasha Levin
2014-04-18 16:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-16 5:44 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-17 15:33 ` Sasha Levin
2014-04-18 3:25 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-14 17:44 ` [PATCH 4/4] kmemcheck: Switch to using kernel disassembler Sasha Levin
2014-04-15 8:17 ` Pekka Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=534CB744.8090208@hitachi.com \
--to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jamie.iles@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.