From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: Update seabios and upstream qemu versions used on xen-unstable Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 14:24:15 +0100 Message-ID: <534D32FF.7020308@eu.citrix.com> References: <534BC268.6030900@m2r.biz> <20140415111832.GA2554@perard.uk.xensource.com> <563734910.20140415135100@eikelenboom.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <563734910.20140415135100@eikelenboom.it> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Sander Eikelenboom , Anthony PERARD Cc: Fabio Fantoni , Ian Jackson , xen-devel , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 04/15/2014 12:51 PM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: > > Tuesday, April 15, 2014, 1:18:32 PM, you wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 01:11:36PM +0200, Fabio Fantoni wrote: >>> I think it would be good to update seabios and upstream qemu versions used >>> with xen-unstable. >>> Recently I tested on my testing system with xen-unstable seabios updated to >>> debian package version 1.7.4-4 without finding regressions and upstream qemu >>> 2.0-rc0 from git where I found 2 regressions already reported and solved on >>> upstream git. >>> I updated qemu to 2.0-rc2 where I did some tests without finding other >>> regressions or bugs for now. >>> I also noticed on the wiki page of the next hackathon the topic "QEMU and >>> SeaBIOS regression testing". As I reported some time ago it would be of >>> great help. > >> I was thinking of submitting the update for QEMU when QEMU 2.0 will be >> out. > > Wouldn't it be sensible for xen-unstable to follow at least the qemu rc's so those > get build and tested in the osstests ? It might make more sense to have a osstest target that used vanilla upstream -- in fact, there may be one already. -George