Hi Denis,

> Hi Slava,
>
> Please do not top-post on this mailing list.

ah, sorry.

>
> On 04/17/2014 03:24 AM, Slava Monich wrote:
>> Hi Denis,
>> It's for custom provisioning plugins.
>>
>> Service provider name is passed to the provisioning plugin but not used
>> there at all. This patch makes it possible to utilize it for AP matching.
>>
> I still do not understand.  SPN is passed to the provisioning plugin via
> get_settings.  I do not see any need for it to be stored in
> ofono_gprs_provision_data struct.  How is it going to be used by the core?

I agree that there is no need to for it to be returned by the 
provisioning plugin to the core but it's the same structure used by 
mbpi.c to return the result of parsing serviceproviders.xml to the 
provisioning plugin. Side effect of sharing the structure between two 
interfaces.

If instead I changed the interface between mbpi and provisioning plugin 
and kept the interface with the core intact, would that look acceptable 
to you?

Thanks,
-Slava