From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Erich Focht <efocht@ess.nec.de>
Cc: Michael Hohnbaum <hohnbaum@us.ibm.com>,
mingo@redhat.com, habanero@us.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: NUMA scheduler (was: 2.5 merge candidate list 1.5)
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:35:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <535130000.1035826537@flay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200210281826.37451.efocht@ess.nec.de>
> I'm puzzled about the initial load balancing impact and have to think
> about the results I've seen from you so far... In the environments I am
> used to, the frequency of exec syscalls is rather low, therefore I didn't
> care too much about the sched_balance_exec performance and prefered to
> try harder to achieve good distribution across the nodes.
OK, but take a look at Michael's second patch. It still looks at
nr_running on every queue in the system (with some slightly strange
code to make a rotating choice on nodes on the case of equality),
so should still be able to make the best decision .... *but* it
seems to be much cheaper to execute. Not sure why at this point,
given the last results I sent you last night ;-)
M.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-28 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-23 21:26 Crunch time -- the musical. (2.5 merge candidate list 1.5) Rob Landley
2002-10-24 16:17 ` Michael Hohnbaum
[not found] ` <200210240750.09751.landley@trommello.org>
2002-10-24 19:01 ` Michael Hohnbaum
2002-10-24 21:51 ` Erich Focht
2002-10-24 22:38 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-25 8:15 ` Erich Focht
2002-10-25 23:26 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-25 23:45 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-26 0:02 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-26 18:58 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-26 19:14 ` NUMA scheduler (was: 2.5 " Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-27 18:16 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-28 0:32 ` Erich Focht
2002-10-27 23:52 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-28 0:55 ` [Lse-tech] " Michael Hohnbaum
2002-10-28 4:23 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-28 0:31 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-28 16:34 ` Erich Focht
2002-10-28 16:57 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-28 17:26 ` Erich Focht
2002-10-28 17:35 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2002-10-29 0:07 ` [Lse-tech] " Erich Focht
2002-10-28 0:46 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-28 17:11 ` Erich Focht
2002-10-28 18:32 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-28 17:38 ` Erich Focht
2002-10-28 17:36 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-28 23:49 ` Erich Focht
2002-10-29 0:00 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-29 1:12 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-10-29 22:39 ` Erich Focht
2002-10-28 7:16 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-25 14:46 ` Crunch time -- the musical. (2.5 " Kevin Corry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=535130000.1035826537@flay \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=efocht@ess.nec.de \
--cc=habanero@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hohnbaum@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.