All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: "xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] xfs: consolidate xfs_bulkstat_single
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:13:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5355DE4B.2000009@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140421235249.GG18672@dastard>


On 04/22 2014 07:52 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 07:11:48AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:58:21AM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
>>> From: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
>>>
>>> In xfs_bulkstat_single(), call xfs_bulkstat_one() and xfs_bulkstat()
>>> would return different error if either failed, we'd better return the
>>> proper error in this case.  Moreover, the function argument done is
>>> useless in terms of xfs_ioc_bulkstat(), hence we can get rid of it.
>>
>> I've looked at xfs_bulkstat_single I really can't see how falling back
>> to the full xfs_bulkstat could fix any error.  We probably should just
>> get rid of the fallback and instead do something like the (lightly tested)
>> patch below:
>>
>> ---
>> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>> Subject: xfs: remove xfs_bulkstat_single
>>
>> xfs_bukstat_one doesn't have any failure case that would go away when
>> called through xfs_bulkstat, so remove the fallback and the now unessecary
>> xfs_bulkstat_single function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> 
> *nod*
> 
> I like this approach :)

I reconsidered the call interface in xfs_fsr and xfs_io/parent.
Yep, your idea is better and the patch looks good to me.


Thanks,
-Jeff

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

      reply	other threads:[~2014-04-22  3:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-18  0:58 [PATCH v2 02/10] xfs: consolidate xfs_bulkstat_single Jeff Liu
2014-04-21 14:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-21 23:52   ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-22  3:13     ` Jeff Liu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5355DE4B.2000009@oracle.com \
    --to=jeff.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.