All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Cookson <steve.cookson@sca-uk.com>
To: Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Comparisons of images between Dazzle DVC100, EasyCap stk1160 and Hauppauge ImapctVCB-e in Linux.
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 16:22:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5357DAC2.20005@sca-uk.com> (raw)

Hi Guys,

I would be interested in your views of the comparisons of these images.  
The still is the image of a duodenum taken during an endoscopy and 
recorded to a DVD player (via an s-video or composite cable).  Although 
the endoscope is an HD endoscope, the DVD recorder isn't and the 
resulting video is 720x480i59.94.

Here are further details of the video:-

Format : MPEG Video v2
Format profile : Main@Main
Format settings, BVOP : Yes, Matrix : Custom, GOP : M=3, N=15
Bit rate mode : Variable
Bit rate : 4 566 Kbps
Maximum bit rate : 10 000 Kbps
Width : 720 pixels
Height : 480 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 4:3
Frame rate : 29.970 fps
Standard : NTSC
Color space : YUV
Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
Bit depth : 8 bits
Scan type : Interlaced
Scan order : Top Field First
Compression mode : Lossy
Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.441

The video was played through Dragon Player and the video signal has 
exited through a mini-VGA port defined as 640x480 and passed through a 
VGA->S-Video converter to an s-video cable.

The cable has in turn been connected in turn to a Dazzle DVC100, an 
EasyCap stk1160 and a Hauppauge ImapctVCB-e.

Each setting (eg brightness and contrast etc) has as near as possible to 
mid-range and a screengrab taken.

The results are shown here:

Original: 
http://tinypic.com/usermedia.php?uo=fNkd6hpTbcMrgmD6gSf74Ih4l5k2TGxc

Dazzle DVC100: 
http://tinypic.com/usermedia.php?uo=fNkd6hpTbcMaOf4QTsIefYh4l5k2TGxc

ImpactVCB-e: 
http://tinypic.com/usermedia.php?uo=fNkd6hpTbcM7i72IqGujuIh4l5k2TGxc

STK1160: 
http://tinypic.com/usermedia.php?uo=fNkd6hpTbcPO7kmQk/IS94h4l5k2TGxc

I would be grateful for your views on the quality of the images.

Is one of materially higher quality than the others, or can I adjust the 
settings to improve the quality of one of them more.

It seems to me that the Hauppauge is marginally better than the others.  
What do you think?

Can I improve the test?

Regards

Steve.




             reply	other threads:[~2014-04-23 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-23 15:22 Steve Cookson [this message]
2014-04-25 12:19 ` Comparisons of images between Dazzle DVC100, EasyCap stk1160 and Hauppauge ImapctVCB-e in Linux Steve Cookson
     [not found]   ` <CALzAhNWvQ1ZYL-0rK2w7yPwzm9QyyCN8JvRyjGhq5eO6rOH9dw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-25 12:48     ` Steven Toth
2014-04-25 12:59       ` Hans Verkuil
2014-04-25 13:26   ` Ezequiel Garcia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5357DAC2.20005@sca-uk.com \
    --to=steve.cookson@sca-uk.com \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.