All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	alan@linux.intel.com, mathias.nyman@intel.com,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl-baytrail: fix for irq descriptor conflict on ASUS T100TA
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 21:30:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5359120E.2030007@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140423122344.GX30677@intel.com>



On 2014/4/23 20:23, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:34:30AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:16:50PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> Well, I can't actually concur. See my results in
>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68291#c44 .
>>>
>>> 1. A kernel with neither patch applied (and no hid-rmi driver) results
>>> in a working touchscreen.
>>> 2. A kernel with only v3 of Doug's patch from
>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67921 results in a working
>>> touchscreen.
>>> 3. A kernel with both v3 of Doug's patch and this IRQ descriptor
>>> conflict "fix" results in a broken touchscreen.
>>>
>>> Seems to me there really is some kind of problem with this patch...
>>
>> Can you try so that you have both patches applied and then this one? I'm
>> suspecting that the ACPI GPIO operation region support might do something
>> unexpected in this case.
> 
> I'm able to reproduce this problem here now and it seems not related to the
> ACPI GPIO operation regions.
> 
> This patch changes call to irq_domain_add_linear() to
> irq_domain_add_simple() and somehow that changes the behaviour so that I
> get non-working touchscreen:
> 
> ...
> [   37.434998] i2c_hid i2c-ATML1000:00: failed to reset device.
> [   37.435009] i2c_hid i2c-ATML1000:00: i2c_hid_set_power
> [   37.435021] i2c_hid i2c-ATML1000:00: __i2c_hid_command: cmd=fb 00 01 08
> [   38.439897] i2c_hid i2c-ATML1000:00: can't add hid device: -61
> [   38.440749] i2c_hid: probe of i2c-ATML1000:00 failed with error -61
> 
> It never gets an interrupt when the device reset is ready.
> 
> Jin, do you have any idea what is going on?
> 

Maybe neither the patch (http://dougvj.net/baytrail_gpio_quirk_v3.patch)
nor my patch breaks the touch screen.

I have tried the clean 3.15-rc2 with following patch which just adds
back the ACPIID "INT33FC", but the touch screen still doesn't work (To
avoid the i915 crash issue, I use with the boot option "nomodeset" in test).

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
index 69e29f4..d79c6d7 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
@@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id
acpi_lpss_device_ids[] = {
        { "80860F14", (unsigned long)&byt_sdio_dev_desc },
        { "80860F41", (unsigned long)&byt_i2c_dev_desc },
        { "INT33B2", },
+       { "INT33FC", },

        { "INT3430", (unsigned long)&lpt_dev_desc },
        { "INT3431", (unsigned long)&lpt_dev_desc },
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
index 6e8301f..447f1dc 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
@@ -572,6 +572,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops byt_gpio_pm_ops = {

 static const struct acpi_device_id byt_gpio_acpi_match[] = {
        { "INT33B2", 0 },
+       { "INT33FC", 0 },
        { }
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, byt_gpio_acpi_match);

Since the clean 3.15-rc2 doesn't contain "INT33FC", so the baytrail gpio
doesn't actually go into effect.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-04-24 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-16 12:05 [PATCH] pinctrl-baytrail: fix for irq descriptor conflict on ASUS T100TA Jin Yao
2014-04-18 20:44 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2014-04-18 21:17   ` Adam Williamson
2014-04-20 10:31   ` Jin, Yao
2014-04-20 12:08     ` Jin, Yao
2014-04-20 15:28       ` Adam Williamson
2014-04-21  6:27         ` Jin, Yao
2014-04-21 13:28           ` Jin, Yao
2014-04-21 14:30             ` Benjamin Tissoires
2014-04-21 15:51               ` Adam Williamson
2014-04-23  5:16               ` Adam Williamson
2014-04-23  8:34                 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-04-23 12:23                   ` Mika Westerberg
2014-04-23 23:18                     ` Adam Williamson
2014-04-24 13:30                     ` Jin, Yao [this message]
2014-04-24 15:58                       ` Adam Williamson
2014-04-24 21:33                       ` Adam Williamson
2014-04-25  7:27                         ` Jin, Yao
2014-04-25  9:40                           ` Mika Westerberg
2014-04-25 12:46                             ` Jin, Yao
2014-04-25  9:32                         ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-25 15:13                           ` Adam Williamson
2014-04-26  3:04                             ` Jin, Yao
2014-04-26  3:42                               ` Jin, Yao
2014-05-02 22:46                                 ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-20 12:56     ` Benjamin Tissoires
2014-04-22 11:51 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-04-22 12:46   ` Jin, Yao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5359120E.2030007@linux.intel.com \
    --to=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=awilliam@redhat.com \
    --cc=benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.