From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Georgi Naydenov Subject: Re: man-pages bug- syslog(3) grammar Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:02:11 +0300 Message-ID: <53597BD3.5040501@gmail.com> References: <5357AF43.8080102@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-man-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org Cc: linux-man List-Id: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Ah, ok then. Thanks for your reply and sorry for the spam ;) Best regards, Georgi =D0=9D=D0=B0 4/24/2014 8:03 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) =D0=BD=D0=B0= =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0: > Hi Georgi! > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Georgi Naydenov wrote: >> Hello Michael, >> I guess that's your email here. First, thank you for your excellent = book! >> (We met at the OpenFest in Sofia, Bulgaria a few years ago and lucki= ly you >> had some copies with you. :) > Yes, I remember. > >> About the pages - nothing special but what do you think about the co= mmas >> when describing notice message priorty here: >> http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/syslog.3.html >> and also in syslog(3) at least on Fedora, CentOS6 and RHEL6/7beta. >> >> LOG_NOTICE normal, but significant, condition >> >> Shouldn't be "significant condition"? For example, as specified in R= =46C5424 >> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5424): >> >> .... >> 5 Notice: normal but significant condition >> 6 Informational: informational messages >> 7 Debug: debug-level messages >> >> Table 2. Syslog Message Severities > Either form works, so I'll leave as is. > > Cheers, > > Michael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html