All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
To: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com>,
	mturquette@linaro.org, tony@atomide.com,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, balbi@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: am33xx-clock: Fix ehrpwm tbclk data.
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 15:07:55 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <535A501B.5080501@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398416125-7139-1-git-send-email-sourav.poddar@ti.com>

On 04/25/2014 11:55 AM, Sourav Poddar wrote:
> tbclk does not need to be a composite clock, we can simply
> use gate clock for this purpose.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx-clocks.dtsi |   42 ++++++++++------------------------
>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx-clocks.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx-clocks.dtsi
> index 9ccfe50..a45d27f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx-clocks.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx-clocks.dtsi
> @@ -96,46 +96,28 @@
>   		clock-div = <1>;
>   	};
>
> -	ehrpwm0_gate_tbclk: ehrpwm0_gate_tbclk {
> +	ehrpwm0_tbclk: ehrpwm0_tbclk@44e10664 {
>   		#clock-cells = <0>;
> -		compatible = "ti,composite-no-wait-gate-clock";
> +		compatible = "gate-clock";

ti,gate-clock? Simple "gate-clock" is not supported.

>   		clocks = <&dpll_per_m2_ck>;
> -		ti,bit-shift = <0>;
> -		reg = <0x0664>;
> +		bit-shift = <0>;

Should be ti,bit-shift as above.

> +		reg = <0x44e10664 0x4>;

You are using an obsolete register format here, the one you removed from 
above was correct.

Same comment applies for the rest of this patch.

-Tero

>   	};
>
> -	ehrpwm0_tbclk: ehrpwm0_tbclk {
> +	ehrpwm1_tbclk: ehrpwm1_tbclk@44e10664 {
>   		#clock-cells = <0>;
> -		compatible = "ti,composite-clock";
> -		clocks = <&ehrpwm0_gate_tbclk>;
> -	};
> -
> -	ehrpwm1_gate_tbclk: ehrpwm1_gate_tbclk {
> -		#clock-cells = <0>;
> -		compatible = "ti,composite-no-wait-gate-clock";
> +		compatible = "gate-clock";
>   		clocks = <&dpll_per_m2_ck>;
> -		ti,bit-shift = <1>;
> -		reg = <0x0664>;
> -	};
> -
> -	ehrpwm1_tbclk: ehrpwm1_tbclk {
> -		#clock-cells = <0>;
> -		compatible = "ti,composite-clock";
> -		clocks = <&ehrpwm1_gate_tbclk>;
> +		bit-shift = <1>;
> +		reg = <0x44e10664 0x4>;
>   	};
>
> -	ehrpwm2_gate_tbclk: ehrpwm2_gate_tbclk {
> +	ehrpwm2_tbclk: ehrpwm2_tbclk@44e10664 {
>   		#clock-cells = <0>;
> -		compatible = "ti,composite-no-wait-gate-clock";
> +		compatible = "gate-clock";
>   		clocks = <&dpll_per_m2_ck>;
> -		ti,bit-shift = <2>;
> -		reg = <0x0664>;
> -	};
> -
> -	ehrpwm2_tbclk: ehrpwm2_tbclk {
> -		#clock-cells = <0>;
> -		compatible = "ti,composite-clock";
> -		clocks = <&ehrpwm2_gate_tbclk>;
> +		bit-shift = <2>;
> +		reg = <0x44e10664 0x4>;
>   	};
>   };
>   &prcm_clocks {
>


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: t-kristo@ti.com (Tero Kristo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm: dts: am33xx-clock: Fix ehrpwm tbclk data.
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 15:07:55 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <535A501B.5080501@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398416125-7139-1-git-send-email-sourav.poddar@ti.com>

On 04/25/2014 11:55 AM, Sourav Poddar wrote:
> tbclk does not need to be a composite clock, we can simply
> use gate clock for this purpose.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx-clocks.dtsi |   42 ++++++++++------------------------
>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx-clocks.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx-clocks.dtsi
> index 9ccfe50..a45d27f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx-clocks.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx-clocks.dtsi
> @@ -96,46 +96,28 @@
>   		clock-div = <1>;
>   	};
>
> -	ehrpwm0_gate_tbclk: ehrpwm0_gate_tbclk {
> +	ehrpwm0_tbclk: ehrpwm0_tbclk at 44e10664 {
>   		#clock-cells = <0>;
> -		compatible = "ti,composite-no-wait-gate-clock";
> +		compatible = "gate-clock";

ti,gate-clock? Simple "gate-clock" is not supported.

>   		clocks = <&dpll_per_m2_ck>;
> -		ti,bit-shift = <0>;
> -		reg = <0x0664>;
> +		bit-shift = <0>;

Should be ti,bit-shift as above.

> +		reg = <0x44e10664 0x4>;

You are using an obsolete register format here, the one you removed from 
above was correct.

Same comment applies for the rest of this patch.

-Tero

>   	};
>
> -	ehrpwm0_tbclk: ehrpwm0_tbclk {
> +	ehrpwm1_tbclk: ehrpwm1_tbclk at 44e10664 {
>   		#clock-cells = <0>;
> -		compatible = "ti,composite-clock";
> -		clocks = <&ehrpwm0_gate_tbclk>;
> -	};
> -
> -	ehrpwm1_gate_tbclk: ehrpwm1_gate_tbclk {
> -		#clock-cells = <0>;
> -		compatible = "ti,composite-no-wait-gate-clock";
> +		compatible = "gate-clock";
>   		clocks = <&dpll_per_m2_ck>;
> -		ti,bit-shift = <1>;
> -		reg = <0x0664>;
> -	};
> -
> -	ehrpwm1_tbclk: ehrpwm1_tbclk {
> -		#clock-cells = <0>;
> -		compatible = "ti,composite-clock";
> -		clocks = <&ehrpwm1_gate_tbclk>;
> +		bit-shift = <1>;
> +		reg = <0x44e10664 0x4>;
>   	};
>
> -	ehrpwm2_gate_tbclk: ehrpwm2_gate_tbclk {
> +	ehrpwm2_tbclk: ehrpwm2_tbclk at 44e10664 {
>   		#clock-cells = <0>;
> -		compatible = "ti,composite-no-wait-gate-clock";
> +		compatible = "gate-clock";
>   		clocks = <&dpll_per_m2_ck>;
> -		ti,bit-shift = <2>;
> -		reg = <0x0664>;
> -	};
> -
> -	ehrpwm2_tbclk: ehrpwm2_tbclk {
> -		#clock-cells = <0>;
> -		compatible = "ti,composite-clock";
> -		clocks = <&ehrpwm2_gate_tbclk>;
> +		bit-shift = <2>;
> +		reg = <0x44e10664 0x4>;
>   	};
>   };
>   &prcm_clocks {
>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-25 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-25  8:55 [PATCH] arm: dts: am33xx-clock: Fix ehrpwm tbclk data Sourav Poddar
2014-04-25  8:55 ` Sourav Poddar
2014-04-25 12:07 ` Tero Kristo [this message]
2014-04-25 12:07   ` Tero Kristo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=535A501B.5080501@ti.com \
    --to=t-kristo@ti.com \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
    --cc=sourav.poddar@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.