All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dave.long@linaro.org (David Long)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3] ARM: uprobes need icache flush after xol write
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 16:16:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <535AC2B5.7070205@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140416.171354.2030799647571837439.davem@davemloft.net>

On 04/16/14 17:13, David Miller wrote:
> From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 21:22:43 +0100
>
>> I'm thinking that both flush_icache_alias() and flush_pfn_alias() want
>> at least a preemption disabled around each so that we don't end up with
>> two threads being preempted here.
>
> Yes, you would need to disable preemption to keep another thread of
> control from potentially using the same flush slot.
>

Sorry for the delay in replying.

I guess the above potential problem is largely independent of the 
uprobes caching issue.

I spent a while reading up on ARM cache operations and MMFR3 register 
contents.  I don't pretend to understand all the details but, based on 
what I do, it looks to me like Victor's v3 patch addresses all the 
issues that we think it needs to.  I also see now why the 
dcache_flush_page() is needed rather than a call to the lower-level 
clean_dcache_line() function.

Victor, maybe you could remove the "#ifdef CONFIG_SMP"s from it and send 
it out as an official (non-RFC) uprobes patch?  It would be really nice 
to get this into V3.15, if at all possible.

-dl

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-25 20:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-16  4:38 [RFC PATCH v3] ARM: uprobes need icache flush after xol write Victor Kamensky
2014-04-16  4:38 ` Victor Kamensky
2014-04-16 15:06   ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-16 15:10     ` David Miller
     [not found]       ` <20140416152946.GA13564@redhat.com>
2014-04-16 15:47         ` David Miller
2014-04-16 16:53           ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-16 20:22           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-16 21:13             ` David Miller
2014-04-25 20:16               ` David Long [this message]
2014-04-25 20:37                 ` Victor Kamensky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=535AC2B5.7070205@linaro.org \
    --to=dave.long@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.