From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Ferre Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] tty/serial: Add helpers to use GPIOs to control modem lines and implement atmel_serial.c Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 06:59:15 -0700 Message-ID: <535D0D33.4050401@atmel.com> References: <1398437561-4289-1-git-send-email-richard.genoud@gmail.com> <20140425155847.GC22879@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eusmtp01.atmel.com ([212.144.249.242]:36487 "EHLO eusmtp01.atmel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750740AbaD0N7X (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2014 09:59:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: Richard Genoud , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Linus Walleij , Alexander Shiyan , "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" On 27/04/2014 02:58, Richard Genoud : > 2014-04-25 17:58 GMT+02:00 Greg Kroah-Hartman : >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 04:52:36PM +0200, Richard Genoud wrote: >>> This patch series is a leftover of http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg314242.html >>> that missed 3.15 because it caused merge conflicts. >>> >>> The 1st patch may be applied as a fix for 3.15-rc, since it correct a >>> device tree binding documentation example. >>> >>> Greg, for you to decide if it's worth it or not ! >> >> Why am I the one tho decides if it is worth it? If it's up to me, I'll >> just say "no", as I sure don't need this for any of my machines... Ok, so I need to speak up and say that the patch series is useful for me :-) > Ok, let me reformulate :) : > > This patch series is a leftover of > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg314242.html > that missed 3.15 because it caused merge conflicts (you acked the > series and ask me to resend it during 3.15-rc cycle). > > I think that "[PATCH 1/5] tty/serial: atmel_serial: Fix device tree > documentation" should be applied on 3.15-rc, > since it corrects a device tree binding documentation example. > > The patches 2-5/5 are for 3.16. BTW, patches 4 and 5 were "Acked" by me in v6 revision of this series. Thanks, bye, -- Nicolas Ferre From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 06:59:15 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 0/5] tty/serial: Add helpers to use GPIOs to control modem lines and implement atmel_serial.c In-Reply-To: References: <1398437561-4289-1-git-send-email-richard.genoud@gmail.com> <20140425155847.GC22879@kroah.com> Message-ID: <535D0D33.4050401@atmel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 27/04/2014 02:58, Richard Genoud : > 2014-04-25 17:58 GMT+02:00 Greg Kroah-Hartman : >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 04:52:36PM +0200, Richard Genoud wrote: >>> This patch series is a leftover of http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg314242.html >>> that missed 3.15 because it caused merge conflicts. >>> >>> The 1st patch may be applied as a fix for 3.15-rc, since it correct a >>> device tree binding documentation example. >>> >>> Greg, for you to decide if it's worth it or not ! >> >> Why am I the one tho decides if it is worth it? If it's up to me, I'll >> just say "no", as I sure don't need this for any of my machines... Ok, so I need to speak up and say that the patch series is useful for me :-) > Ok, let me reformulate :) : > > This patch series is a leftover of > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg314242.html > that missed 3.15 because it caused merge conflicts (you acked the > series and ask me to resend it during 3.15-rc cycle). > > I think that "[PATCH 1/5] tty/serial: atmel_serial: Fix device tree > documentation" should be applied on 3.15-rc, > since it corrects a device tree binding documentation example. > > The patches 2-5/5 are for 3.16. BTW, patches 4 and 5 were "Acked" by me in v6 revision of this series. Thanks, bye, -- Nicolas Ferre