From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
To: Linux-Fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, Theodore T'so <tytso@mit.edu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Subject: Status of fcntl() mandatory locking
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 17:35:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <535D23D8.8080005@gmail.com> (raw)
Hello all,
For a long time now, the fcntl(2) man page has carried this text
regarding mandatory (byte-range) locking:
Mandatory locking
The implementation of mandatory locking in all known versions
of Linux is subject to race conditions which render it unreli‐
able: a write(2) call that overlaps with a lock may modify data
after the mandatory lock is acquired; a read(2) call that over‐
laps with a lock may detect changes to data that were made only
after a write lock was acquired. Similar races exist between
mandatory locks and mmap(2). It is therefore inadvisable to
rely on mandatory locking.
I wanted to check: does it remain true with modern kernels that mandatory
locking is unreliable? If things have changed, an uopdate to the man page
is obviously in order.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next reply other threads:[~2014-04-27 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-27 15:35 Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) [this message]
2014-04-28 10:07 ` Status of fcntl() mandatory locking Jeff Layton
2014-04-29 5:21 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=535D23D8.8080005@gmail.com \
--to=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.