From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pbonzini@redhat.com (Paolo Bonzini) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:03:23 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v8 3/3] ARM: Check if a CPU has gone offline In-Reply-To: References: <1398455329-18136-1-git-send-email-ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> <1398455329-18136-4-git-send-email-ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Message-ID: <535E519B.7070101@redhat.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Il 28/04/2014 14:23, Christoffer Dall ha scritto: > Are they inter-dependent? I thought your patches depended on Anup's - > not the other way around? > > If my assumption is correct, I think we can make sure to send the pull > request to kvm/next early and ask Catalin to pull in kvm/next before > pulling your changes. > > I'm cc'ing both Catalin and Paolo here for their advice. Is Anup's patchset already on a branch? If you send me a pointer to it I can look at that branch history and see what's best. Paolo