From: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Change the calculation of next pstate
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:34:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <535FD4A6.3050905@semaphore.gr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpomhUk7RQ3YL3=wpVKSbK_oSkyYBRUZiqnHzWqrZ2DjRRA@mail.gmail.com>
On 29/04/2014 07:58 πμ, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Cc'd Dirk,
>
> On 28 April 2014 03:42, Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> wrote:
>> Currently the driver calculates the next pstate proportional to
>> core_busy factor and reverse proportional to current pstate.
>>
>> Change the above method and calculate the next pstate independently
>> of current pstate.
>
> We must mention why the change is required.
>
Hi Viresh,
Actually, I can't say that it's required. :)
I just believe that calculation of next p-state should be independent
from current one. In my opinion we can't scale the load across different
p-states, because it's not always equivalent.
For example suppose a load of 100% because of a tight for loop in the
current p-state. It will be also a 100% load in any other p-state.
It will be wrong if we scale the load in the calculation formula
according to the current p-state.
I included the test results in the change log to point out an improvement
because of this patch.
I will enrich more the change log as you suggested.
Thanks,
Stratos Karafotis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-29 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-27 22:12 [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Change the calculation of next pstate Stratos Karafotis
2014-04-29 4:58 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-04-29 16:34 ` Stratos Karafotis [this message]
2014-04-29 21:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-01 18:42 ` Dirk Brandewie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=535FD4A6.3050905@semaphore.gr \
--to=stratosk@semaphore.gr \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.