From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id D7988E004EB; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 03:25:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [80.91.229.3 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (auslands-kv[at]gmx.de) * -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E25DE003C7 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 03:25:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WfRhD-0003Ql-Vf for yocto@yoctoproject.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:24:59 +0200 Received: from 80-218-32-173.dclient.hispeed.ch ([80.218.32.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:24:59 +0200 Received: from auslands-kv by 80-218-32-173.dclient.hispeed.ch with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:24:59 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: yocto@yoctoproject.org From: Neuer User Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:24:43 +0200 Message-ID: <5360CF6B.1020007@gmx.de> References: <535E5198.60709@windriver.com> <535E54BB.7060701@windriver.com> <535E59A1.1080808@windriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 80-218-32-173.dclient.hispeed.ch User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 In-Reply-To: <535E59A1.1080808@windriver.com> Subject: Re: Kernel config fragments are not applied X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:25:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Bruce Have you got any further? I currently use a "defconfig" replacement, but honestly, it feels very dumb. Fragments seem to be much smarter to combine and test different configurations. Cheers Michael Am 28.04.2014 15:37, schrieb Bruce Ashfield: > On 14-04-28 09:35 AM, Neuer User wrote: >> Am 28.04.2014 15:16, schrieb Bruce Ashfield: >>> It all depends on how adventurous you are today :) Using a defconfig >>> will work, and you can generate one without much trouble. Using >>> fragments will allow you to keep your changes separate from the >>> baseline configuration, but you'll need to tweak the recipe .. which >>> always carries a risk of some unexpected side effects. >>> >>> I'm around to help regardless of which way you chose. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Bruce >>> >> >> Well, I looked at the linux-yocto file and tried a couple of >> combinations in my bbappend. All of them geenrated lots of different >> errors. > > If you send me pointers to your bblayers and local.conf settings, I'll > run a build to see what happens here as well. > > I'm always interested in tracking these down regardless. > > Bruce > >> >> e.g. I used: >> >> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-${PV}:" >> >> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_cubox-i = "(cubox-i)" >> >> SRC_URI += "file://videoin.cfg" >> >> addtask kernel_configme before do_configure after do_patch >> >> # Pick up shared functions >> inherit kernel >> inherit kernel-yocto >> #require linux-dtb.inc >> >> # extra tasks >> addtask kernel_configcheck after do_configure before do_compile >> >> >> The error messages are too long to include here :-/ >> >> Guess, it is probably best to go the defconfig way. >> >