From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 08E1AE0098E; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:21:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [147.11.146.13 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D847FE0096C for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:21:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s3UJLnrj018272 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:21:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.56.48] (128.224.56.48) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.169.1; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:21:49 -0700 Message-ID: <53614D3F.6040005@windriver.com> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 15:21:35 -0400 From: Bruce Ashfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neuer User , References: <535E5198.60709@windriver.com> <535E54BB.7060701@windriver.com> <535E59A1.1080808@windriver.com> <53614482.8010102@windriver.com> <53614BFB.3070100@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <53614BFB.3070100@gmx.de> Subject: Re: Kernel config fragments are not applied X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 19:21:58 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 14-04-30 03:16 PM, Neuer User wrote: > Am 30.04.2014 20:44, schrieb Bruce Ashfield: >> Can you send me your bblayers out of band ? I'm using meta-fsl-arm >> and meta-fsl-arm-extra to get a build going, and running into >> expansion errors in the kernel recipes. Rather than hunt around >> more than necessary, I'll check against your layers. >> >> Bruce >> > Sure: > > LCONF_VERSION = "6" > > BBPATH = "${TOPDIR}" > BSPDIR := "${@os.path.abspath(os.path.dirname(d.getVar('FILE', True)) + > '/../..')}" > > BBFILES ?= "" > BBLAYERS = " \ > ${BSPDIR}/sources/poky/meta \ > ${BSPDIR}/sources/poky/meta-yocto \ > \ > ${BSPDIR}/sources/meta-openembedded/meta-oe \ > ${BSPDIR}/sources/meta-openembedded/meta-multimedia \ > \ > ${BSPDIR}/sources/meta-fsl-arm \ > ${BSPDIR}/sources/meta-fsl-arm-extra \ > ${BSPDIR}/sources/meta-fsl-demos \ > ${BSPDIR}/sources/meta-openembedded/meta-ruby \ > ${BSPDIR}/sources/meta-qt5 \ > ${BSPDIR}/sources/meta-mylayer \ > " Hrm. I have all the key layers right, which leaves me with the expansion issue. The README indicates the danny branch for the meta-fsl-* layers, is that what you are using ? Bruce > > Not sure that you need all. meta-ruby and qt5 is needed for my application. > >