From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@freescale.com>,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, scottwood@freescale.com
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v2] powerpc: move epapr paravirt init of power_save to an initcall
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 22:25:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53615C2F.1090603@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398889209-10350-1-git-send-email-stuart.yoder@freescale.com>
On 30.04.14 22:20, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> From: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@freescale.com>
>
> some restructuring of epapr paravirt init resulted in
> ppc_md.power_save being set, and then overwritten to
> NULL during machine_init. This patch splits the
> initialization of ppc_md.power_save out into a postcore
> init call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@freescale.com>
Looks pretty good to me and IMHO should get a CC on stable when it gets
into the tree. One minor nit below.
We still need to clarify whether the omitted check on
early_init_dt_scan_epapr() is on purpose and if not reintroduce it, but
that's a separate issue.
> ---
>
> -v2: don't iterate over the entire DT, just look at
> the hypervisor node
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/epapr_paravirt.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/epapr_paravirt.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/epapr_paravirt.c
> index 7898be9..a01df5e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/epapr_paravirt.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/epapr_paravirt.c
> @@ -53,11 +53,6 @@ static int __init early_init_dt_scan_epapr(unsigned long node,
> #endif
> }
>
> -#if !defined(CONFIG_64BIT) || defined(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3E_64)
> - if (of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "has-idle", NULL))
> - ppc_md.power_save = epapr_ev_idle;
> -#endif
> -
> epapr_paravirt_enabled = true;
>
> return 1;
> @@ -70,3 +65,23 @@ int __init epapr_paravirt_early_init(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
v
> +static int __init epapr_idle_init(void)
> +{
> + struct device_node *node;
> +
> + if (!epapr_paravirt_enabled)
> + return 0;
> +
> + node = of_find_node_by_path("/hypervisor");
> + if (!node)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_64BIT) || defined(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3E_64)
Please move the #if scope from v to ^. That way we don't waste space /
time / anything on systems that don't bother with the idle hcall.
> + if (of_get_property(node, "has-idle", NULL))
> + ppc_md.power_save = epapr_ev_idle;
> +#endif
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +postcore_initcall(epapr_idle_init);
^
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-30 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-30 20:20 [PATCH][v2] powerpc: move epapr paravirt init of power_save to an initcall Stuart Yoder
2014-04-30 20:25 ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2014-04-30 22:48 ` Scott Wood
2014-04-30 23:14 ` Stuart Yoder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53615C2F.1090603@suse.de \
--to=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=stuart.yoder@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.