From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 15:56:33 -0700
Subject: [U-Boot] [Patch v2 1/2] common/board_f: Preserve global data
 for mpc85xx and mpc86xx
In-Reply-To: <1398898280.24575.224.camel@snotra.buserror.net>
References: <1398893511-22085-1-git-send-email-yorksun@freescale.com>	
	<1398897910.24575.221.camel@snotra.buserror.net>	
	<53617DCC.8050403@freescale.com>
	<1398898280.24575.224.camel@snotra.buserror.net>
Message-ID: <53617FA1.3070809@freescale.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 04/30/2014 03:51 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 15:48 -0700, York Sun wrote:
>> On 04/30/2014 03:45 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 14:31 -0700, York Sun wrote:
>>>> For powerpc SoCs (including mpc85xx, mpc86xx), global data is used for
>>>> initializing LAWs, before calling function baord_inti_f(). This data
>>>> should not be cleared later.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Change log
>>>>  v2: Instead of adding back gd init for all PPC, preserve gd for mpc85xx and mpc86xx.
>>>>
>>>>  Note, need other maintainers to fix 83xx, 5xxx, 512x as I don't have boards to verify.
>>>>
>>>>  common/board_f.c |    6 +++++-
>>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/common/board_f.c b/common/board_f.c
>>>> index cbdf06f..eebb377 100644
>>>> --- a/common/board_f.c
>>>> +++ b/common/board_f.c
>>>> @@ -970,7 +970,11 @@ static init_fnc_t init_sequence_f[] = {
>>>>  
>>>>  void board_init_f(ulong boot_flags)
>>>>  {
>>>> -#ifndef CONFIG_X86
>>>> +	/*
>>>> +	 * For MPC85xx, global data is initialized in cpu_init_early_f() and
>>>> +	 * used for init_law(). gd should not be cleared in this function.
>>>> +	 */
>>>> +#if !defined(CONFIG_X86) && !defined(CONFIG_MPC85xx) && !defined(CONFIG_MPC86xx)
>>>>  	gd_t data;
>>>>
>>>>  	gd = &data;
>>>
>>> It would be better to introduce a CONFIG_SYS_EARLY_GD (or similar)
>>> rather than growing a list here.
>>
>> That's do-able.
>>
>>>
>>> Is there any reason why the set of targets for which zero_global_data()
>>> is skipped is different from the set of targets where the gd
>>> instantiation and assignment is skipped?
>>
>> I would think the list should be identical. But without proper testing, I am
>> reluctant to copy the list. As you have suggested, start from 85xx first.
>> Non-mpc85xx can be dealt with when they get converted.
> 
> None of those other PPC targets currently use the generic board.  They
> will be tested when they are converted.
> 

Are you suggesting to copy the list, instead of only putting those tested? It
may save other maintainer some effort of debugging. But I can't be sure they
will all work.

York