From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Corey Minyard Subject: Re: Can PAX and Rt-patch co-exist ? Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 18:53:46 -0500 Message-ID: <53618D0A.2050609@mvista.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Mau Z , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail-oa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.219.46]:64432 "EHLO mail-oa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754724AbaD3Xxt (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2014 19:53:49 -0400 Received: by mail-oa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id i4so2133519oah.5 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:53:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/30/2014 05:47 PM, Mau Z wrote: > I have some more questions concerning the relation between PAX and the > RT-Patch : > A) Can they work together ? It can be made to work. We have it working together in our distribution. > B) Do you know if it matters which patch is applied first ? Not really. > C) Is there any documentation about this subject ? None that I know of. I imagine that I'm the only person who has ever done this. There are some conflicts (a few are non-trivial, but not excessively complicated, IIRC). But it's not something insurmountable. You do have to have a fairly good understanding of kernel code. -corey > > > Thanks > zmau > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html