From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: What should the Ceph Foundation be about ? Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 16:35:00 +0200 Message-ID: <53625B94.1090309@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AVjcP29sjApoFwKE3vouCeTwKF2blN65e" Return-path: Received: from smtp.dmail.dachary.org ([91.121.254.229]:60440 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751298AbaEAOfF (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 May 2014 10:35:05 -0400 Received: from [10.9.0.6] (unknown [10.0.2.28]) by smtp.dmail.dachary.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA10C42B2E for ; Thu, 1 May 2014 16:35:00 +0200 (CEST) Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --AVjcP29sjApoFwKE3vouCeTwKF2blN65e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ceph co-developers, I wrote down a few ideas about what I'd like the Ceph Foundation to provi= de, from a developer perspective :=20 https://wiki.ceph.com/Development/Foundation This is no more than a wishlist, feel free to add whatever you have in mi= nd ;-) Cheers --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --AVjcP29sjApoFwKE3vouCeTwKF2blN65e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlNiW5QACgkQ8dLMyEl6F23ZrwCcC3eM8tpC/affk9Xb1tlYybWy qowAn1RyNScFP/bDGc7MgIJaFTS0XfV7 =SVZV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AVjcP29sjApoFwKE3vouCeTwKF2blN65e--