From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Branchaud Subject: Re: Pull is Evil Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 15:43:07 -0400 Message-ID: <5362A3CB.5020203@xiplink.com> References: <4ay6w9i74cygt6ii1b0db7wg.1398433713382@email.android.com> <536106EA.5090204@xiplink.com> <536152D3.5050107@xiplink.com> <5361598f8eaf7_4781124b2f02b@nysa.notmuch> <536173F5.7010905@xiplink.com> <53617877b41a9_41a872f308ef@nysa.notmuch> <20140501094610.GB75770@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net> <5362664C.8040907@xiplink.com> <53629eda40a52_76612eb2f062@nysa.notmuch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Felipe Contreras , Junio C Hamano , Marat Radchenko , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 01 21:42:44 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WfwsW-0001Sj-3f for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 01 May 2014 21:42:44 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751408AbaEATmk (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 May 2014 15:42:40 -0400 Received: from smtp146.ord.emailsrvr.com ([173.203.6.146]:40592 "EHLO smtp146.ord.emailsrvr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750851AbaEATmk (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 May 2014 15:42:40 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp31.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 8E8103A853A; Thu, 1 May 2014 15:42:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp31.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: mbranchaud-AT-xiplink.com) with ESMTPSA id 826833A8304; Thu, 1 May 2014 15:42:38 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 In-Reply-To: <53629eda40a52_76612eb2f062@nysa.notmuch> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 14-05-01 03:22 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote: > Marc Branchaud wrote: >> What's more, it seems to me that the only real advantage "git pull" >> provides here is a less typing compared to the non-pull equivalent: >> >> git fetch main-repo >> git checkout main-repo/maintenance-branch >> git fetch developer-remote >> git merge --no-ff developer-remote/topic-branch >> git push main-repo HEAD > > You mean `git push main-repo HEAD:maintenance-branch`, right? Right. Sorry, for that command I thoughtlessly just copied Brian's example. M.