From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2lp0235.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E33814015E for ; Sat, 3 May 2014 16:51:40 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <5364904E.5070900@Freescale.com> Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 01:44:30 -0500 From: Emil Medve MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Wood , Lijun Pan Subject: Re: powerpc/mpc85xx: Remove P1023 RDS support References: <1397841480-2652-1-git-send-email-Lijun.Pan@freescale.com> <20140503001318.GA19925@home.buserror.net> In-Reply-To: <20140503001318.GA19925@home.buserror.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello Scott, On 05/02/2014 07:13 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:18:00PM -0500, Lijun Pan wrote: >> P1023RDS is no longer supported by Freescale while P1023RDB is still supported. > > Please wrap changelogs at no more than 75 columns. > >> Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan >> >> --- >> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1023rds.dts | 219 --------------------- >> arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_defconfig | 1 - >> arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_smp_defconfig | 1 - >> arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig | 6 +- >> arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Makefile | 2 +- >> .../platforms/85xx/{p1023_rds.c => p1023_rdb.c} | 36 +--- >> 6 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 255 deletions(-) >> delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1023rds.dts >> rename arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/{p1023_rds.c => p1023_rdb.c} (75%) > > As discussed internally, I'd like to see more of an explanation for why > it should be removed upstream -- what sort of maintenance burden it's > causing, or why this board should be considered of so little interest to > users that we should remove it regardless of current maintenance burden. When discussed internally I believe we addressed these points but I guess not to your satisfaction. I suspect you're not asking for a replay so I'm trying to get actual numbers of boards sold hoping that would make the conversation a bit more objective Cheers,