From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SCzgN-0003yz-Rw for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 22:41:28 +0200 Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Mar 2012 13:32:23 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,351,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="126246625" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.123.243]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Mar 2012 13:32:22 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Alex J Lennon Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:32:21 +0100 Message-ID: <5366685.RG9uTzE68W@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.8.0 (Linux/3.0.0-16-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.1; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <4F736B9F.9050304@dynamicdevices.co.uk> References: <1332888458-15872-1-git-send-email-ajlennon@dynamicdevices.co.uk> <2372633.2CZh3kKOpL@helios> <4F736B9F.9050304@dynamicdevices.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Modified fetch() checksums to be correct for libpng 1.4.28 released 15/3/12 (current) instead of previous 8/3/12 release X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:41:28 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Wednesday 28 March 2012 20:50:55 Alex J Lennon wrote: > Paul, > > >FYI, I'm pretty sure that fetch2 from the version of bitbake we use with > >OE- > I thought it might. Does it still do that if the checksum fails though? Yes, I believe (without having tested it recently) that a SRC_URI checksum failure is considered in the same way as if the download failed. > >Of course that's assuming there is a mirror available. > > I'm happy to host a 2nd copy and mod the .bb to add another source if > that helps (the > libpng repo seems to have a history of deleting versions from what I saw > of the patch > history so it might be a good idea?). Is that ok for everybody? No harm in it, however I believe it may be better to get it on sources.openembedded.org - I think the usual procedure is to ping Tom King (ka6sox on IRC) and then send get the files to him so he can upload them there. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre