From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44526) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Whafc-0002hz-Jg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 04:24:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WhafV-0004q3-Iu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 04:24:12 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:54700 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WhafV-0004po-Bo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 04:24:05 -0400 Message-ID: <53689C23.2030203@suse.de> Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 10:24:03 +0200 From: Alexander Graf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1399356506-5609-1-git-send-email-edgar.iglesias@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1399356506-5609-1-git-send-email-edgar.iglesias@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 00/22] target-arm: Preparations for A64 EL2 and 3 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Edgar E. Iglesias" Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com, rob.herring@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, john.williams@xilinx.com, alex.bennee@linaro.org On 05/06/2014 08:08 AM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote: > From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" > > Hi, > > I've been doing some work on modeling parts of EL2 and 3 + some of > the system-wide virtualization features for ARMv8. A lot is missing > but I've got a series with enough to for example run KVM A64 guests > on top of EL3 firmware inside emulated QEMU A64 VMs. > I'm working on cleaning things up and plan to send patches and publish > things as I go. > > This series does a first round of preparations. Most of it has little > or no user visible impact as the EL2 and 3 features remain disabled. > > For the arrayification of the various EL regs that do not exist for > EL0, I've used index macros. I don't really have a preference here, > so if you have better/less ugly ideas or preferences I'm happy to change > the pattern (getters/setters or whatever). > > Happy to address any comments people may have. I've only had a rough glimpse at the patches, but so far things look pretty sane. Alex