From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from owm.eumx.net (eumx.net [91.82.101.43]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1FD60196 for ; Tue, 6 May 2014 16:29:20 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53690546.90806@communistcode.co.uk> Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 16:52:38 +0100 From: Jack Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <5364B398.5000802@embed.me.uk> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Website Text X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 16:29:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/05/14 09:46, Samuel Stirtzel wrote: > 2014-05-03 11:15 GMT+02:00 Jack Mitchell : > >> * Support/Advantages/Available Recipes >> >> - General input; can you think of any better subheadings or things >> we should be advertising? > > Hi, > > KDE desktop is not really "supported", it is at a stale tech preview stage. > Since my priorities have been shifted, there is no time to look into a > KDE Frameworks 5 port. > (Patches are welcome, but it may be easier to just fork the layer). > > Do we have any version of KDE working at this moment in time? -- Jack Mitchell (jack@embed.me.uk) Embedded Systems Engineer Cambridgeshire, UK http://www.embed.me.uk --