From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] KVM: emulate: avoid repeated calls to do_insn_fetch_bytes
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 10:34:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5369F020.2040706@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jpgfvkmi5h6.fsf@nelium.bos.redhat.com>
Il 07/05/2014 06:21, Bandan Das ha scritto:
>> > + if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINNUE)
>> > + goto done;
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > while (size--) {
>> > - if (unlikely(ctxt->_eip == fc->end)) {
>> > - rc = do_insn_fetch_bytes(ctxt);
>> > - if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
>> > - return rc;
>> > - }
>> > *dest++ = *src++;
>> > ctxt->_eip++;
>> > continue;
>> > @@ -4273,7 +4282,7 @@ int x86_decode_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, void *insn, int insn_len)
>> > if (insn_len > 0)
>> > memcpy(ctxt->fetch.data, insn, insn_len);
>> > else {
>> > - rc = do_insn_fetch_bytes(ctxt);
>> > + rc = do_insn_fetch_bytes(ctxt, 1);
> Is this saying that if the cache is full, then we fetch one more byte ?
>
No, it is saying that if the instruction is being executed for the first
time (we can execute it multiple times if we reenter a repeated
instruction after a userspace exit) we try to get at least one byte from
RIP. Most of the time, do_insn_fetch_bytes will fetch 15 bytes which
are the maximum length of an instruction.
Passing op_size == 1 matches this change in do_insn_fetch_bytes:
- if (unlikely(size == 0))
+ if (unlikely(size < op_size))
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-07 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-06 18:16 [RFC PATCH 0/4] KVM: emulator: speed up instruction fetch Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-06 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] KVM: emulate: speed up do_insn_fetch Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-07 2:30 ` Bandan Das
2014-05-07 8:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-06 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] KVM: emulate: avoid repeated calls to do_insn_fetch_bytes Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-07 4:21 ` Bandan Das
2014-05-07 8:34 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-05-06 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] KVM: emulate: avoid per-byte copying in instruction fetches Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-07 4:36 ` Bandan Das
2014-05-07 8:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-06 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] KVM: emulate: put pointers in the fetch_cache Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5369F020.2040706@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=bsd@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.