From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36817) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WiL92-00025F-R5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 May 2014 06:01:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WiL8w-00067c-JD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 May 2014 06:01:40 -0400 Message-ID: <536B55FD.1090801@suse.de> Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 12:01:33 +0200 From: Alexander Graf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1394720011-2482-1-git-send-email-tommusta@gmail.com> <534817B8.8060501@suse.de> <534820F0.2040104@twiddle.net> <34BA7020-1AA7-489B-803A-50AE67352AEF@suse.de> <5368DB5A.4010703@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5368DB5A.4010703@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [V2 PATCH 0/6] Refactor AES Instructions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Tom Musta Cc: "qemu-ppc@nongnu.org" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Richard Henderson On 05/06/2014 02:53 PM, Tom Musta wrote: > On 4/11/2014 5:53 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >>> Am 11.04.2014 um 19:05 schrieb Richard Henderson : >>> >>> On 04/11/2014 09:26 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: >>>>> V2: updated patch 05/06 per Richard Henderson's review (const pointer to const) >>>> Looks good to me. Which queue should this go through? IMHO Richard would be the >>>> perfect person to get this through one of his. >>> I'm happy with it going through ppc-next. >>> It's minimal changes to i386 and arm, honestly. >>> >>> Plus it's less work for me. ;-) >> Then I need your Ack or Reviewed-by tags :) >> >> Alex >> >>> >>> r~ > Ping. Is there actually anything more you need, Alex? Richard did review. Oops, missed them :). Thanks, applied to ppc-next. Alex