From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: bradley.d.volkin@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Use hash tables for the command parser
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 14:42:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <536B89B8.9070303@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398698528-25256-1-git-send-email-bradley.d.volkin@intel.com>
On 04/28/2014 04:22 PM, bradley.d.volkin@intel.com wrote:
> From: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com>
>
> For clients that submit large batch buffers the command parser has
> a substantial impact on performance. On my HSW ULT system performance
> drops as much as ~20% on some tests. Most of the time is spent in the
> command lookup code. Converting that from the current naive search to
> a hash table lookup reduces the performance impact by as much as ~10%.
I have another question - what about register lookups, do they come up
in profiling as significant?
Regards,
Tvrtko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-08 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-28 15:22 [PATCH] drm/i915: Use hash tables for the command parser bradley.d.volkin
2014-04-28 15:42 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-28 16:01 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-04-28 15:48 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-04-28 15:53 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-28 16:07 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-04-28 16:11 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-05-07 16:34 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-05-08 9:56 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2014-05-08 11:44 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-05-08 12:25 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2014-05-08 13:02 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-05-08 13:24 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2014-05-08 13:52 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-05-08 15:27 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-05-08 15:45 ` Ville Syrjälä
2014-05-08 16:02 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-05-12 16:24 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-05-12 16:41 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-05-12 17:47 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-05-08 15:50 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2014-05-08 16:04 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-05-08 13:05 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-05-08 13:15 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-05-08 15:53 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-05-08 15:59 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-05-08 13:42 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2014-05-08 15:40 ` Volkin, Bradley D
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-05-10 21:10 bradley.d.volkin
2014-05-12 13:47 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-05-12 14:49 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2014-05-12 16:49 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=536B89B8.9070303@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bradley.d.volkin@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.