From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Jim Davis <jim.epost@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 7 (argh)
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 09:54:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <536BB6D4.8020309@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140508011030.GT19657@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
On 05/07/2014 06:10 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>>>> ps2mult.c:(.exit.text+0x8f): multiple definition of `cleanup_module'
>>>>> ps2mult.c:(.init.text+0xbc8): multiple definition of `init_module'
>>>>> ipack.c:(.exit.text+0x0): multiple definition of `cleanup_module'
>>>>> ipack.c:(.init.text+0x0): multiple definition of `init_module'
>>>>> mcb-core.c:(.text+0x40d): multiple definition of `cleanup_module'
>>>>> mcb-core.c:(.text+0x3fb): multiple definition of `init_module'
>>>>
>
> It sounds like it misdetects your binutils. LTO should
> disable itself when your binutils cannot handle it. Can you send me
> the full build log and output of ld --version and gcc --version
> please?
Hi Andi,
I see this message:
scripts/Makefile.lto:82: "WARNING: GCC 0407 too old for LTO/WHOPR. CONFIG_LTO disabled"
so that seems to be working OK.
I think that the init_module/cleanup_module problems are due to some errors
in my automated scripts. Sorry about that. Please ignore my original report.
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-08 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-07 7:33 linux-next: Tree for May 7 Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-07 7:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-07 20:52 ` linux-next: Tree for May 7 (argh) Randy Dunlap
2014-05-07 21:45 ` Jim Davis
2014-05-07 22:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-07 22:17 ` Jim Davis
2014-05-08 1:10 ` Andi Kleen
2014-05-08 16:54 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2014-05-08 17:05 ` Jim Davis
2014-05-08 17:08 ` Andi Kleen
2014-05-08 17:40 ` Jim Davis
2014-05-07 21:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-07 22:31 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=536BB6D4.8020309@infradead.org \
--to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jim.epost@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.