* [uml-devel] 1 zombie process after starting a 23 bit UML guest
@ 2014-05-09 21:16 Toralf Förster
2014-05-09 21:47 ` Toralf Förster
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Toralf Förster @ 2014-05-09 21:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: UML devel
Today I realized that current kernels produces a zombie proces :
tfoerste@n22 ~ $ ps aux | grep 'Z' | grep '<defunct'
tfoerste 10918 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Zs 23:11 0:00 [linux-v3.12-48-] <defunct>
The last kernel which does not produce such a zombie is kernel 3.11
I do not use a xterm for any output, just "con0=fd:0,fd:1 con=pts". However I'm unsure if this is an already known issue (and I just forgot it) or whether I should kick my test box to bisect the guelty commit id between 3.11 and 3.12
--
Toralf
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
• 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
• Requirements for releasing software faster
• Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [uml-devel] 1 zombie process after starting a 23 bit UML guest
2014-05-09 21:16 [uml-devel] 1 zombie process after starting a 23 bit UML guest Toralf Förster
@ 2014-05-09 21:47 ` Toralf Förster
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Toralf Förster @ 2014-05-09 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: UML devel
On 05/09/2014 11:16 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> Today I realized that current kernels produces a zombie proces :
>
> tfoerste@n22 ~ $ ps aux | grep 'Z' | grep '<defunct'
> tfoerste 10918 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Zs 23:11 0:00 [linux-v3.12-48-] <defunct>
>
> The last kernel which does not produce such a zombie is kernel 3.11
>
> I do not use a xterm for any output, just "con0=fd:0,fd:1 con=pts". However I'm unsure if this is an already known issue (and I just forgot it) or whether I should kick my test box to bisect the guelty commit id between 3.11 and 3.12
>
My mistake,
the zombie process is created, if I start the UML just as a back ground process.
If I prepend my command line with "nohup" in such a case then a zombie process isn't made.
--
Toralf
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
• 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
• Requirements for releasing software faster
• Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-05-09 21:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-05-09 21:16 [uml-devel] 1 zombie process after starting a 23 bit UML guest Toralf Förster
2014-05-09 21:47 ` Toralf Förster
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.