From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: emilio@elopez.com.ar (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Emilio_L=F3pez?=)
Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 14:22:15 -0300
Subject: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 0/6] sunxi: clk: Various cleanup and rework
In-Reply-To: <1399692821-20988-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
References: <1399692821-20988-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Message-ID: <536E6047.8010004@elopez.com.ar>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Maxime,

El 10/05/14 00:33, Maxime Ripard escribi?:
> Hi everyone,
>
> This patchset fixes a few things that have been pending for quite a
> while in the clock driver.
>
> First, it removes the clk_put calls in the clock protection
> part. Since it's not really something that should be done, I guess
> this patch is not very controversial.
>
> Then, it starts splitting the huge clock driver file into separate,
> smaller drivers when it makes sense.
>
> Finally, it reworks the clock protection mechanism to handle
> differences between SoC in a better way. This has been pretty
> controversial because the first approach has been to move this to the
> machine code. This is another attempt that leaves all the
> modifications in the driver itself.
>
> Thanks,
> Maxime

Overall the series looks good to me, other than the comment about clkdev 
on patches 2 and 3.

@Mike, do you want me to take them in a pull as usual after you have a 
look? Please let me know as we still haven't clarified the situation 
with the two patches Hans sent.

Cheers, and thanks Maxime for working on cleaning this :)

Emilio