Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU build broken

[Brad Smith <brad@comstyle.com>]

On 10/05/14 3:07 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 10/05/2014 08:45, Brad Smith ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Having your feature in-tree is a privilege, not a right.  You earn it by
>>> helping to maintain it.  "it's not really maintained right now" means it
>>> has not been earning its keep.  You're encouraged to remedy that.
>>
>> Huh? "my feature"? I have nothing to do with this. What kind of crazy
>> is this? How to misdirect and not take responsibility for breaking
>> something. If there wasn't sloppy irresponsible development in the
>> first place it wouldn't be an issue.
>
> Brad,
>
> all this is doing, is convincing people that bsd-user is not worth
> keeping in the tree.  It's a fact that in a million-line codebase not
> all patches can be tested by all people.

My posts have nothing to do with bsd-user. I don't give a shit about it.
The real issue is the process and the fact that someone removed a 
constant from the configure script and didn't even grep the tree to see
if it existed anywhere else. That is very sloppy.

> Why don't you send a patch instead of whining?

Constantly trying to deflect from the real issues.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.