From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 22:41:43 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2014-05-09 In-Reply-To: <20140511145522.GH4096@tarshish> References: <20140510063010.4D1F81010DF@stock.ovh.net> <536E86B1.4050005@mind.be> <20140511043405.GB4096@tarshish> <536F8C6E.1050004@mind.be> <20140511145522.GH4096@tarshish> Message-ID: <536FE087.1030103@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 11/05/14 16:55, Baruch Siach wrote: > Hi Arnout, > > On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 04:42:54PM +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: >> On 11/05/14 06:34, Baruch Siach wrote: [snip] >>> Your patch is correct, I guess, but as far as I understand it doesn't solve >>> the host architecture dependency problem that is causing the host-protobuf >>> failure above. >> >> True. We could add a dependency on BR2_HOSTARCH for that. Except that Kconfig >> doesn't support string comparison AFAIK. So we'd need to create bool symbols for >> all the supported host architectures... > > How would that solve the problem? Host packages are selected directly from > Makefiles, regardless of Kconfig settings, isn't it? Or do you intend to add > host architecture dependencies to all reverse dependencies of host-protobuf > (currently: protobuf-c, protobuf, python-protobuf, and their reverse > dependencies)? Exactly. But I don't really think it's worthwhile to do that - except for the autobuilder, there is probably nobody who tries building on anything except x86. Regards, Arnout -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F