From: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>, Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / suspend: Always use deepest C-state in the "freeze" sleep state
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 22:19:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5370D85C.3090505@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5370D5E4.5040001@linaro.org>
On 2014/5/12 22:08, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 05/05/2014 12:51 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>>
>> If freeze_enter() is called, we want to bypass the current cpuidle
>> governor and always use the deepest available (that is, not disabled)
>> C-state, because we want to save as much energy as reasonably possible
>> then and runtime latency constraints don't matter at that point, since
>> the system is in a sleep state anyway.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>> ---
>>
>> This is on top of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4071541/ .
>>
>
> Wouldn't make sense to revisit play_dead instead ?
>
play_dead() is broken.
Even if it works, we still should rely on cpuidle driver to place the
CPUs into the deepest c-state, because there is no architectural way to
enter deepest c-state and what play_dead() does is a bad assumption.
Thanks,
-Aubrey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-12 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-04 22:51 [PATCH] PM / suspend: Always use deepest C-state in the "freeze" sleep state Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-05 12:46 ` Li, Aubrey
2014-05-09 7:38 ` Pavel Machek
2014-05-09 11:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-09 14:13 ` Pavel Machek
2014-05-09 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-12 14:08 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-05-12 14:19 ` Li, Aubrey [this message]
2014-05-12 14:52 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-05-12 23:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5370D85C.3090505@linux.intel.com \
--to=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.