From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33040)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tommusta@gmail.com>) id 1WkBW1-0007IR-0E
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 May 2014 08:09:09 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tommusta@gmail.com>) id 1WkBVr-0007nR-VX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 May 2014 08:09:00 -0400
Message-ID: <53720B4D.4050905@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 07:08:45 -0500
From: Tom Musta <tommusta@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1399713400-8619-1-git-send-email-dougkwan@google.com>
	<5371C471.6040603@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <5371C471.6040603@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 0/3] Adding new user mode
	target ppc64le-linux-user
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Doug Kwan <dougkwan@google.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org
Cc: riku.voipio@iki.fi

On 5/13/2014 2:06 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
> On 10.05.14 11:16, Doug Kwan wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I have made changes based on comments to the previous set of pathces.
>>
>> 1. Target name is now ppc64le-linux-user.
>> 2. I used a memop mask to avoid generating redundant byteswap pairs that
>>     cancel out each other.  This is suggested by Peter Maydell.
>> 3. There is code to handle machine name correctly in uname.
>>
>> This is not mean to be final though.  Tom Musta of IBM kindly offered to help
>> me with this.  So I am handling over this set of patches.  Tom will continue
>> from this version.
>>
>> Thanks for all the comments and suggestions so far.
> 
> I like the patch set for the most part. I guess in v3 it will be ready for inclusion :).
> 
> 
> Alex
> 
> 

Doug & I have agreed that I will take these the rest of the way.   I am still testing in a few
environments that are different from Doug's and may have a few additions.

Also, Peter suggested that LTP be run ... I am going to look into this but as a follow-on effort to
these patches.