From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753571AbaEMSwM (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2014 14:52:12 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-f51.google.com ([74.125.83.51]:37053 "EHLO mail-ee0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754519AbaEMSv1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2014 14:51:27 -0400 Message-ID: <53725FDE.30006@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 20:09:34 +0200 From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Zijlstra CC: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, lkml , Juri Lelli , Dario Faggioli , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] sched: sched_setattr/sched_getattr fixes and improvements References: <536CEAEE.4010609@gmail.com> <20140509171640.GA30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> In-Reply-To: <20140509171640.GA30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/09/2014 07:16 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 04:49:18PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >> Peter, >> >> While looking at your sched_setattr()/sched_getatr() documentation, >> I noticed a bug in the handling of -EFBIG, and a couple of places >> in the code where the error handling logic could be streamlined. >> Patches follow. > > Thanks! Hi Peter, I was a little unclear on what "Thanks" meant... Does it mean you plan to apply all 3 patches in your tree to go upstream? Thanks, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/