Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] IOMMU support for ARM

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>]

On 05/14/2014 03:05 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 16:50 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Julien Grall (14):
>>   xen/arm: Introduce flush_tlb_domain
> 
> Acked + applied.
> 
>>   xen/passthrough: amd: Remove domain_id from hvm_iommu
>>   xen/passthrough: amd: rename iommu_has_feature into
>>     amd_iommu_has_feature
>>   xen/passthrough: vtd: iommu_set_hwdom_mapping is VTD specific
>>   xen/passthrough: rework hwdom_pvh_reqs to use it also on ARM
>>   xen/passthrough: iommu: Split generic IOMMU code
>>   xen/passthrough: iommu: Introduce arch specific code
> 
> Jan already applied these, although I see that the penultimate patch is
> s/IOMMU // in the applied version -- perhaps from a previous revision?

No, Jan has reworking my commit title to drop superfluous word. He
already did it on most of my past commit in common code.

> You should check.
> 
>>   xen/passthrough: iommu: Basic support of device tree assignment
>>   xen/passthrough: Introduce IOMMU ARM architecture
>>   MAINTAINERS: Add drivers/passthrough/arm
>>   xen/arm: Don't give IOMMU devices to dom0 when iommu is disabled
> 
> Applied these

Thanks!

>>   xen/arm: p2m: Clean cache PT when the IOMMU doesn't support coherent
>>     walk
>>   xen/arm: grant: Add another entry to map MFN 1:1 in dom0 p2m
>>   drivers/passthrough: arm: Add support for SMMU drivers
> 
> Discussion seems to be ongoing on the first and third and I wasn't sure
> about taking the third by itself.

I guess you meant the second here? It's completely independent and can
be applied.

Regards,

-- 
Julien Grall