All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
To: "Eric Sandeen" <sandeen@redhat.com>,
	"Lukáš Czerner" <lczerner@redhat.com>,
	dchinner@redhat.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Separate mailing list for xfstests
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 11:02:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53738597.70305@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53738316.20601@redhat.com>



On 05/14/2014 10:52 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 5/14/14, 8:20 AM, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> I am wondering whether you're open to the idea of creating separate
>> mailing list for xfstests. It is no longer xfs specific project and
>> even though you're still a maintainer of the project, other fs folks
>> are definitely interested in the development process, but not
>> everyone might be interested in receiving everything from the
>> xfs@oss.sgi.com list.
>>
>> To speak for myself I would like to help with review of xfstests
>> patches as well, but I rarely go through my xfs folder
>> unfortunately.
>>
>> linux-fsdevel might seem as a good candidate for it, but still I
>> think that it deserves a separate ML to point people to.
>>
>> What do you think ?
> 
> That sounds pretty reasonable to me.  We've always encouraged submissions
> to cc: the other relevant lists (i.e. linux-ext4 if it's an ext4-specific
> patch) and would probably still encourage that, but even from the other
> angle (keeping i.e. ext4-specific and btrfs-specific patches off the
> xfs list) this sounds like a good idea.

+1 here.

-chris

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-14 15:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-14 13:20 Separate mailing list for xfstests Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-14 13:20 ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-14 14:52 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-05-14 15:02   ` Chris Mason [this message]
2014-05-14 16:04     ` tytso
2014-05-14 16:04       ` tytso
2014-05-14 16:50       ` Tyler Hicks
2014-05-14 16:50         ` Tyler Hicks
2014-05-14 21:35       ` Dave Chinner
2014-05-15 10:08         ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-15 10:08           ` Lukáš Czerner
2014-05-14 21:46 ` Dave Chinner
2014-05-14 21:46   ` Dave Chinner
2014-05-15 10:09   ` Lukáš Czerner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53738597.70305@fb.com \
    --to=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.