From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42838) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WkcB8-0000Pt-Cr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 May 2014 12:37:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WkcB3-0008KF-Fo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 May 2014 12:37:14 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:19487) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WkcB3-0008K3-86 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 May 2014 12:37:09 -0400 Message-ID: <53739BB2.5060104@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 10:37:06 -0600 From: Eric Blake MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CWxjQJ2ii2Llb9nFTiOvH1X0boiUJMD74" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] vnc or spice which one is better List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Kekane, Abhishek" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --CWxjQJ2ii2Llb9nFTiOvH1X0boiUJMD74 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/14/2014 09:32 AM, Kekane, Abhishek wrote: > Hi All, >=20 > Just wondering which graphics device is better between vnc and spice in= terms of features and performance? Spice is better. > ______________________________________________________________________ > Disclaimer:This email and any attachments are sent in strictest confide= nce Unfortunately, such a disclaimer is unenforceable on publicly-archived mailing lists. You are better off using a personal account instead of blasting disclaimers from your employer's account, particularly when the disclaimer occupies more than twice the size of your actual content. --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --CWxjQJ2ii2Llb9nFTiOvH1X0boiUJMD74 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTc5uyAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqmQkIAIqMyvwKzlWsQI5Jz+KOXrtl 5ApjEdSeUYZGOSPs5NNVKYbyiwO8lE23M8q/ehDXi+DwJDfEJlZO7fD714gYRZ+j aQ7+Z7DlQ9lEjkOqsderL8NrQadOyj9S5HLEGKCk3TAPTlZWOYacHxs0ketwwUJV p52sYtpFgmn4TijoNc9KhHSp+tAgrM+ZfyFr1w7YNVFa2lBF5lMHGRdoqBKp+i+f M3HMhNAVglBvl35nTjSpZRW5454A/NXVP+bRDnHd5VFOw7wvry8PF8OEI1CLm3IW ZuMxEQWIxM6AFIdsffUoFlwhg9DX+PHyVCaSJT4hFnQCsls8cr0vmtWEZFKcRZ0= =f9BD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CWxjQJ2ii2Llb9nFTiOvH1X0boiUJMD74--