All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <5374D59E.2010502@linaro.org>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 3b2bc7e..f1b1cd6 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 
 Hi Kumar,
 On 15/05/14 15:31, Kumar Gala wrote:
-> I’d rather have the driver have the select of ARM_AMBA and not the core support.  We clearly don’t need to build ARM_AMBA in to function.
+> I?d rather have the driver have the select of ARM_AMBA and not the core support.  We clearly don?t need to build ARM_AMBA in to function.
 
-Shouldn’t driver depend on it rather than selecting it?
+Shouldn?t driver depend on it rather than selecting it?
 
 Suggested approach will end up changing the way its done on other SOCs,
 Currently all the SOCs select ARM_AMBA at there machine level Kconfig 
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 7e8bb1d..1a86a1a 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,22 +1,17 @@
  "ref\01400148535-30772-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org\0"
  "ref\04FB5A6A0-B4C5-4E97-AD7D-8049CFA60393@codeaurora.org\0"
- "From\0Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] ARM: QCOM: Enable ARM_AMBA option for Qcom SOCS.\0"
+ "From\0srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org (Srinivas Kandagatla)\0"
+ "Subject\0[PATCH] ARM: QCOM: Enable ARM_AMBA option for Qcom SOCS.\0"
  "Date\0Thu, 15 May 2014 15:56:30 +0100\0"
- "To\0Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>\0"
- "Cc\0David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>"
-  Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
-  linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
-  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
- " linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "\n"
  "Hi Kumar,\n"
  "On 15/05/14 15:31, Kumar Gala wrote:\n"
- "> I\342\200\231d rather have the driver have the select of ARM_AMBA and not the core support.  We clearly don\342\200\231t need to build ARM_AMBA in to function.\n"
+ "> I?d rather have the driver have the select of ARM_AMBA and not the core support.  We clearly don?t need to build ARM_AMBA in to function.\n"
  "\n"
- "Shouldn\342\200\231t driver depend on it rather than selecting it?\n"
+ "Shouldn?t driver depend on it rather than selecting it?\n"
  "\n"
  "Suggested approach will end up changing the way its done on other SOCs,\n"
  "Currently all the SOCs select ARM_AMBA at there machine level Kconfig \n"
@@ -29,4 +24,4 @@
  "thanks,\n"
  srini
 
-ed40c396d5c825005c561de45b3c25b4363ad05f6dd0c306035c4e9b48b44811
+91fda8ae0d5d3d55076d1ba05ff71500716af20d00f87c9e2f729d6117e56989

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.