From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Figa Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Adds PMU and S2R support for exynos5420 Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 23:22:41 +0200 Message-ID: <53753021.5050801@gmail.com> References: <1399982522-27928-1-git-send-email-a.kesavan@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:48446 "EHLO mail-ee0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752811AbaEOVWx (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2014 17:22:53 -0400 Received: by mail-ee0-f41.google.com with SMTP id t10so1009849eei.14 for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 14:22:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1399982522-27928-1-git-send-email-a.kesavan@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Abhilash Kesavan , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, vikas.sajjan@samsung.com, t.figa@samsung.com Hi Abhilash, On 13.05.2014 14:01, Abhilash Kesavan wrote: > Rebased on > 1] Kukjin Kim's tree for-next branch (which has Sachin Kamat's SYSRAM > patches merged) with Tomasz Figa's samsung clock tree (samsung-next branch) > merged. > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git/log/?h=for-next > 2] Pankaj Dubey's v4 PMU patchset > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/10/29 I think this patch is not safe to base on yet. I need to find time to review the latest version and share my latest view on this with Pankaj, as I have a bit different design in mind. In general, I don't like the fact that you end up with using regmap to access registers that are used exclusively by PMU driver or for accesses happening at late suspend or early resume, where concurrent accesses from other drivers simply can't occur. Best regards, Tomasz From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 23:22:41 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v4 0/4] Adds PMU and S2R support for exynos5420 In-Reply-To: <1399982522-27928-1-git-send-email-a.kesavan@samsung.com> References: <1399982522-27928-1-git-send-email-a.kesavan@samsung.com> Message-ID: <53753021.5050801@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Abhilash, On 13.05.2014 14:01, Abhilash Kesavan wrote: > Rebased on > 1] Kukjin Kim's tree for-next branch (which has Sachin Kamat's SYSRAM > patches merged) with Tomasz Figa's samsung clock tree (samsung-next branch) > merged. > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git/log/?h=for-next > 2] Pankaj Dubey's v4 PMU patchset > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/10/29 I think this patch is not safe to base on yet. I need to find time to review the latest version and share my latest view on this with Pankaj, as I have a bit different design in mind. In general, I don't like the fact that you end up with using regmap to access registers that are used exclusively by PMU driver or for accesses happening at late suspend or early resume, where concurrent accesses from other drivers simply can't occur. Best regards, Tomasz