Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv2 net-next] xen-netback: fix race between napi_complete() and interrupt handler

[David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>]

On 16/05/14 09:30, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 18:17 +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
>> When the NAPI budget was not all used, xenvif_poll() would call
>> napi_complete() /after/ enabling the interrupt.  This resulted in a
>> race between the napi_complete() and the napi_schedule() in the
>> interrupt handler.  The use of local_irq_save/restore() avoided by
>> race iff the handler is running on the same CPU but not if it was
>> running on a different CPU.
>>
>> Fix this properly by calling napi_complete() before reenabling
>> interrupts (in the xenvif_napi_schedule_or_enable_irq() call).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> - Rename xenvif_check_rx_xenvif() to
>>   xenvif_napi_schedule_or_enable_irq() to make it more obvious what it
>>   does.
> 
> Which is to update the event pointer such that IRQs are generated again
> rather than enabling IRQs as such (enable_irq makes me think of
> EFLAGS.IF). But given that I can't think of a better way to describe it:
> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>

Would xenvif_napi_schedule_or_enable_event() be better?

David